In this ERISA health plan case, the insurer had offered to freeze premiums for a substantial period of time to settle an earlier dispute over payments under the plan; but then allegedly reneged. The insured brought suit under various state law theories, including bad faith. The action was removed to federal court and a partial motion to dismiss was filed, on the basis that ERISA pre-empted the claims over this alleged settlement agreement. The court found itself “constrained by the ‘extraordinary preemptive power’ of ERISA,” and it refused to remand the action. It dismissed the statutory bad faith claim, among others.
Date of Decision: November 17, 2016
Shore v. Independence Blue Cross & Independence Health Group, No. 16-5224, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160022 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 17, 2016) (McHugh, J.)